Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and total score (7.08 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
