Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and the durability (5.5 out of 10). Still, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
