Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX
