Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and the ball bearings (4). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a durability of 5.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
