Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (200g / 7,05oz) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 60X
