Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (205g / 7,23oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
