Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
