Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
