Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
