Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs and a durability of 5.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
