Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX stands out for a ball bearings of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
