Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
