Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
