Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
