Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and total score (7.08 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Cardiff 401A?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- Scoring 8.88 out of 10 (337g / 11.89oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
