Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and total score (7.08 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
