Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2500X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
