Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and the durability (5.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a weight of 215g / 7.58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX
