Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8.82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
