Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
