Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX
