Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24.02 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
