Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
