Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
