Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
