Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
