Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- The 5 out of 10 (4.8:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
