Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
