Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
