Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
