Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
