Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X
