Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
