Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
