Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin INKS 2000X
