Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
