Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
