Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX
