Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
55.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
