Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
