Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
