Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6878oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26772 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Delphin FRIZ
