Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
