Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 6500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 6500X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 520g / 18,34oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa BG 6500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
