Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
64.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
