Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
