Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
