Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X
