Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
