Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (520g / 18,34oz). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin INKS?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
