Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
