Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin SHARX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
