Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Battle III 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Penn Battle III
Spinning
74.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 2000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 520g / 18,34oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
